Expropriation without compensation undermines constitutional legitimacy
Any amendment to the Constitution of South Africa, whether in text or by way of interpretation, to facilitate expropriation without compensation, would seriously undermine the Constitution’s constitutional legitimacy. So says Piet le Roux, CEO of AfriBusiness.
Business organisation, AfriBusiness, today submitted its comments on the proposed amendment of the Constitution to the Constitutional Review Committee. In the executive summary, AfriBusiness states that it opposes the proposed amendment, and says that:
1. Expropriation of property without compensation is an act of confiscation.
2. A constitutional dispensation that allows for the confiscation of property or a constitution which in its text allows for the confiscation of property ceases to be a real constitution because it reneges on the very notion of constitutionalism. This implies that both an amendment to the text of the Constitution and an amended interpretation of the current text of the Constitution to the effect of legitimising confiscation would be equally unacceptable.
3. The denial of compensation for expropriated property amounts to a denial of a remedy, which constitutes a violation of the South African constitution as well as of international law.