In reply to a Democratic Alliance (DA) parliamentary question to the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, as to whether or not Schabir Shaik has applied for a presidential pardon, the Minister has responded by saying the question should be referred to the Presidency:
"...the Presidency, as the constitutional power whether or not to grant a pardon and the arrangement, determination and control of the processes attendant upon the discharge lies with the President of the Republic of South Africa and not the Minister."
The DA will do so. But the Minister's response is disingenuous and is shown up as such by his response to a similar question from the IFP. The disparity between the two responses suggests the Minister is either ignorant as to the nature of the process of applying for a Presidential Pardon, or has something to hide. In other words, Mr Shaik has indeed applied and the Department is doing what it can to keep the matter off the public record. And the only reason it would do that, is because it is considering granting the pardon, which would be unconscionable.
In reply to an IFP question, asking whether the same Department had received similar applications from two other individuals, the Minister stated that his department had indeed received the applications and that "All the applications, including the ones under question, were processed and are currently in the Office of the President".
Why is the Minister willing to answer that question but unable to confirm, one way or the other, if Mr Shaik has applied?
The process of applying for a Presidential Pardon requires an individual to first apply to the Minister of Justice, before that application is then forwarded onto the Presidency. This must happen because the Department of Justice is responsible for motivating to the Presidency either in favour or in opposition to the application.