Initial response to the Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement
30 October 2024
The Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement delivered in Parliament on Wednesday, 30 October 2024, by the Minister of Finance, Enoch Godongwana, appears as the post-1996 fiscal and monetary policy paradigm maintenance entrenched in failed neo-liberal prescriptions. These have proven incapable of resolving the long-term unemployment, poverty and inequality crises, along with de-industrialisation. These crises persist, for 28 years of neo-liberal policy failure since 1996, further fuelling the high levels of crime and household social reproduction crisis – the severe hardship affecting millions of working-class and poor families unable to support life itself. A decisive break from this paradigm is essential for building a people’s economy and dismantling the entrenched wealth and income inequalities.
Once again, the Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement prioritises the policy reforms championed by imperialist-dominated institutions, among others, the Washington-based International Monetary Fund and World Bank and the Paris-based Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. These institutions push neo-liberal economic policies that attack public ownership and participation in the economy in favour of the accumulation of wealth on a capitalist basis.
After the 2008 global capitalist system crisis, the attack on state ownership and participation in the economy increasingly focused on opening up and converting the state into a capitalist wealth accumulation field, among others, with state infrastructure networks the main target of microeconomic liberalisation and privatisation. This agenda is part of the wider neo-liberal attack on state participation in productive sectors and in the long run aims to do away with state participation in vital network infrastructure sectors, like electricity generation, to transfer control to private producers, who put profits over public interest.
The shift from a producer state to a tender state, or a procurement state, undermines the very principles of a capable democratic developmental state that has its own capacity to fulfil its mandate and serve the people diligently. It also opens the door to procurement corruption or “supply chain mismanagement” under the guise of “supply chain management” inherent in a tender state.