Hlophe costs: Minister Radebe has misled South African public
Despite repeated assurances to the contrary, Justice Minister Jeff Radebe has confirmed yesterday, in a reply (see below) to a parliamentary question, that Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe will not be required to repay the legal costs incurred in connection with the court cases brought by the Premier of the Western Cape and Freedom under Law.
Whilst many ordinary South Africans struggle on a daily basis to afford access to justice to prosecute very meritorious cases, Hlophe has managed to take a case to the highest court in the land at the expense of the South African taxpayer, with the full support of the Justice Minister. And he has done this all to protect himself from facing a misconduct enquiry as a result of complaints from Judges of the Constitutional Court.
This is contrary to what the South African public was told last year. It was reported that Justice Director-General Nonkululeko Sindane said: "The correct position is that for any person that we provide legal support to, they have to provide an undertaking for the completeness of the settlement of the bill at the end of the process if they are not successful".
This was confirmed by Justice Minister Jeff Radebe on 7 June 2011 at a pre-budget media briefing, when he said that the ministry would pay for Hlophe's costs but only once he had provided a written undertaking to repay the state in the event that he lost his case at the Constitutional Court. He reportedly said "That's what we have done for everybody".
Hlophe lost his Constitutional Court case in March 2012, when he was refused leave to appeal against the two judgments of the Supreme Court of Appeal. These judgments overturned a decision of the Judicial Services Commission not to proceed with an enquiry into allegations of misconduct against Hlophe for trying to influence Constitutional Court judges in respect of corruption charges against Jacob Zuma.