Justice delayed, justice denied: A constitutional crisis in SA
24 November 2023
The chronic inefficiency plaguing the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) and the persistent delays in delivering judgments by our courts raises serious constitutional concerns, jeopardising the very essence of justice in our democratic society.
The recent delayed impeachment proceedings against judges John Hlophe and Nkola Motata have exposed the JSC's repeated failures in fulfilling its core constitutional obligations. These failures cast doubt not only on the JSC's ability to uphold the principles enshrined in the Constitution, but also affect the independence and resilience of our judiciary, which is of course, a linchpin of our constitutional democracy.
The JSC, as mandated by the Constitution, is entrusted with the vital task of recommending individuals for judicial appointment. Section 174 of the Constitution requires the appointment of any “appropriately qualified” man or woman who is a “fit and proper person”. “Fit and proper” requires, in essence, the appointment of judges who will, in accordance with section 165(2), uphold the principle that “the courts are independent and subject only to the Constitution and the law which they must apply impartially and without fear, favour or prejudice”. Once candidates can comply with these requirements, consideration must be given, in accordance with section 174(2), to “the need for the judiciary to reflect broadly the racial and gender composition of South Africa.
However, recent events, notably the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA), expose a stark deviation from these constitutional principles.