Like Caesar's wife, the Public Protector must be above suspicion
8 September 2023
On 29 August 2023, Kholeka Gcaleka, who is the Acting Public Protector (APP), was nominated as the candidate to succeed the disgraced Busisiwe Mkhwebane as Public Protector (PP). Mkhwebane's predecessor, Advocate Thuli Madonsela, demonstrated how the office of Public Protector could play a crucial role in holding to account state institutions that were suspected of improper conduct. Indeed, her fearless exposure of state capture under President Jacob Zuma played a pivotal role in forcing his resignation. Sadly, Mkhwebane did not continue this proud tradition and instead mired the office in unseemly controversy after controversy, racking up an unprecedented number of judicial rebukes in the process.
What is needed now is a visionary leader, with an irreproachable record who will be able to regain public trust by investigating, without fear or favour, allegations of improper conduct at all levels of Government. Unfortunately, there are doubts whether Adv Gcaleka fits the bill.
Section 181 of the Constitution requires the PP to be “independent, and subject only to the Constitution and the law”. It goes on to require that he or she “must be impartial” and must exercise his or her powers and perform his or her functions “without fear, favour or prejudice.”
On 30 June, Adv Gcaleka, as APP, cleared President Ramaphosa of allegations that he had violated the executive ethics code in connection with the theft at his Phala Phala farm in February 2020. Yet towards the end of last year, an independent panel headed by former Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo found that the President may have committed serious violations of the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act and the Constitution “by exposing himself to a situation involving a conflict between his official responsibilities and his private business”. Accordingly, questions were inevitably raised regarding the credibility of Adv Gcaleka’s investigation.