National Health Insurance: ANC proposals do not address South Africa's public healthcare crisis
Improving access to quality health care in South Africa is essential. However, the DA believes that the priority in providing quality public health care is not to change the financing mechanism for the public health system, as the ANC believes, but rather in improving the basics of delivery and ensuring that the money that is available is used for its intended purpose. We do not believe that the mooted National Health Insurance (NHI) will adequately address the problems that plague the public health system, as it represents more bureaucracy and more centralisation, and therefore in fact will only worsen the problems that public healthcare faces.
The ANC says that its proposal is premised on the need to afford universal health coverage, and enhance "social solidarity". This is the first slight-of-hand in the argument, because public healthcare in South Africa is already universal -- any citizen and resident of the country may access it. Nobody can be turned away from accessing services at a public health institution and the poor receive free health care. The real problem is of quality. And in the past this has been consistently ignored by the ANC government, particularly in its insistence on using the public health system as a vehicle for its political programmes of cadre deployment and centralisation.
Numerous research studies have been conducted into the state of the public health sector. From these studies, five major points of breakdown in our system are identified again and again. These are:
* Mismanagement of funds
* Centralisation
* Poor management because of inappropriate management appointments
* Poor hospital conditions
* Shortage of skilled healthcare personnel
It is these problems which directly affect the quality and the actual delivery of public healthcare. Our concern is this: at best, the NHI sweeps these problems under the carpet; at worst, it may actually perpetuate them. More problematic still is the fact that research done by the Ministerial Advisory Committee on the NHI seems to have been driven by the need to justify the NHI, rather than to genuinely explore the alternatives, and address the real problems that public healthcare studies have identified.