No, MEC Maile, we understand perfectly
21 January 2020
What you label as a series of ‘wild and unsubstantiated’ allegations in your article of the 20th January, are merely observations of your timely, and opportunistic move to grab power in the City of Tshwane.
The crux of your argument MEC, that your section 139 (1) intervention in the City of Tshwane, aimed at ‘restoring the delivery of basic services and bringing back good governance and stability to the municipality’ invalidates everything that comes after, because a substantiated fact is that the City of Tshwane is delivering, is governed well, and is financially stable. Stating that a City which had a stable outlook assigned to it by Moody’s for improving its operating performance, and which corrected an inherited R2 billion deficit is not financially sustainable, is simply irrational.
By your own admission MEC, the provisions of section 154(1) state clearly that your mandate, and role, is to support and strengthen the capacity of municipalities to manage their own affairs, to exercise their powers and to perform their functions. That, unfortunately is not open to interpretation, despite your insistence on presenting ‘alternative facts’ as truth.
Tell us MEC, where is the feedback from your Committee of Inquiry that you established in August last year, to look at the health, stability and sustainability of all our municipalities in Gauteng? You gave yourself three months to carry out this work, and stated that ‘of the 11 municipalities including the three metros, only two municipalities- Midvaal and Ekurhuleni are in a healthy state’. You jump to action in Tshwane MEC, yet where are the action plans for these 8 other municipalities? I would hate to think that this Committee was merely a smokescreen to hide your true intentions, namely to hijack the City of Tshwane.