Phiyega’s suspension: Zuma, the ball’s in your court
National Police Commissioner (NPC), Riah Phiyega, by telling President Jacob Zuma she needs more time and clarity before providing reasons why she should not be suspended, is playing games with the President – and, indeed with South Africa. This is not a new ploy. She used the same tactics in the Farlam Commission when she was drilled on Marikana and has dodged accountability in a similar manner during appearances before Parliament’s Police Portfolio Committee.
Phiyega’s latest move was to wait until the eleventh hour of her 26 August 2015 deadline and request further clarity as to why she shouldn’t be suspended. Instead of granting her this deadline, President Zuma should include this delaying tactic in her list of failings and contempt for her obligations and begin instituting the steps to have her disciplined and removed.
The President is empowered, in terms of section 84(2)(f) of the Constitution, to institute the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into allegations of misconduct and/or lack of fitness for the office. He must now be firm and go ahead with her suspension, to ensure that she doesn’t use her powerful position to influence the investigation or compromise its integrity.
Additionally section 207(1) of the Constitution vests authority in the President to summarily discharge her from office and he must now act to investigate her fitness or fire her once and for all. There is ample grounds for either remedy and he should not allow himself to be given the run-around by a police chief who has now employed ignorance as her latest delaying tactic.
The ordinary South African has come to expect a Police Commissioner who delays and obfuscates and does all to evade due accountability for her disastrous tenure as police chief over the last three years. There is no acceptable excuse she can possibly come up with to convince the President that she should not be suspended during the term of a Judicial Commission as it sits to examine her fitness to hold office.