Open letter in response to Oregan Hoskins, President of SARU
09 September 2015
It is really sad that this is the kind of justification that SARU uses to try and vindicate itself, making a massive public statement through the President to try and argue against the failure of transformation over the past 20 years. The point that we made was a simple one; there are black players and white players who are better than thee favourites in the team.
Why are these injured old white players elected? Whose interests are served? Clearly they are not our country’s best. The Argentinean game showed the point, the majority black team is better than the majority white Springbok team so stop repeating the SARU narrative that less white players equals a weaker team.
The million rand spin doctors have now only been able to craft a response to the widespread criticism of the resource allocation and control of rugby at all levels of the game. They don’t touch on many of the areas where they are obviously exposed, like the black history of the sport and why certain players are excluded. They try this Apartheid style spin doctoring gimmick of trying to set the narrative for what we must consider in our South African National sports. A sport that receives millions of rand from public funds, being the tax rebates sponsors get for giving money to rugby and the elites of rugby.
Instead of presenting platitudes to the nation that tries to conjure up some misplaced patriotism through rugby jerseys on Friday and taking some silly grass to the World Cup. Why does the President not talk about the real things in rugby, such as the lack of opportunity for the young black child in black clubs and schools? If you want to get the blacks who are concerned about rugby transformation, behind the game, then tell us who the representative starting 15 is for the first match, or why the clubs and schools at Junior level are not forced to share facilities and resources under SARU in the Western Cape.