SADTU's proposed go-slow constitutes an illegal strike
The DA is not deceived by SADTU's announcement of a go-slow commencing this week. Teachers are obliged by the Employment of Educators Act and their conditions of service to work outside of the seven hours of teaching. Refusing to work more than seven hours a day is tantamount to declaring the withholding of labour, and thus constitutes the declaration of a strike.
There appear to be three primary reasons for this "go-slow".
The first is the failure of the Department of Education to honour a 2011 agreement to increase the salaries of matric exam markers. This failure, and the alleged breakdown of the collective bargaining process in this regard, affects only markers; it does not affect the conditions of service of teachers.
The second is the call by SADTU for the removal of Minister Motshekga and the Education Department Director-General, Bobby Soobrayan. This call has merits and demerits but the fact is that neither the Minister nor the DG plan on resigning soon, and SADTU hasn't explained how the current Minister and DG's continued presence affects the conditions of service of teachers.
The third is SADTU's anger and resentment towards the Minister's announcement of a biometric attendance monitoring system. Again, their argument has merits and demerits, but the issue does not affect the conditions of service of teachers.