Solidarity wins Renate Barnard affirmative action case in Supreme Court of Appeal
The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in Bloemfontein today found in favour of Solidarity and Capt. Renate Barnard in one of the country's most controversial affirmative action cases. Barnard's legal battle against the South African Police Service (SAPS) for promotion lasted more than eight years. Apart from having to pay the legal costs of the Labour Court, the Labour Appeal Court and the SCA, the SAPS must compensate Barnard.
‘The ruling is a huge victory for Solidarity and Capt. Barnard. She had to fight for justice for eight years. Her tenacity captured people's imagination,' said Dirk Hermann, Executive Officer of Solidarity. The full bench of the SCA found that the SAPS had discriminated unfairly against Barnard on the basis of race. ‘According to the judgment, employment equity cannot be achieved by mechanically applying formulas and numerical targets. The ruling further states that in order to determine equity, a flexible and situation-sensitive approach must be followed.'
Hermann said the ruling makes it clear that numerical targets cannot be used as absolute criteria when filling posts. ‘Numerical targets lead to quotas, and the Employment Equity Act does not allow quotas. The ruling also touches on the issue of service delivery. According to the judgment, the South African Constitution expects the police service to be professional and effective, and to use its resources efficiently. The judges found that filling the post for which Barnard had applied was critical and that the police's argument that it wasn't, was a lie. The judges found that Barnard's non-appointment in the post in question had negatively affected service delivery.'
Barnard's fight against affirmative action started in 2005. She applied for the same post twice. She was named the best candidate and her appointment was recommended by the interview panels on both occasions. The post was, however, not filled. After the post had been advertised a third time and Barnard had again applied for it, it was withdrawn.
A factsheet regarding the case follows below: