AN URGENT APPEAL BY THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SPEAKER REGARDING THE REQUEST FOR SPECIAL LEAVE AS A MATTER OF GRAVE CONCERN
22 March 2024
The uMkhonto we Sizwe Party has noted with grave concern the recent developments involving the National Assembly Speaker, Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula, who has had to take special leave in the wake of serious allegations against her of corruption and a raid conducted by the National Prosecuting Authority’s (NPA) , and the Investigating Directorate at her residence for her imminent arrest.
Our primary concern is over the apparent selective enforcement of the judicial system, and therefore particularly when compared to other significant cases with broader implications for our country’s governance and moral compass. A classic example of this discrepancy is the Phala Phala farm gate incident where unexplained monies of over $4 million were allegedly stuffed into sofas and mattresses therefore leading to the conclusive violation by the South President’s of the 2004 Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act (PRECCA).
Section 34(1) of PRECCA imposes a reporting obligation, in terms of which “persons in a position of authority”, as defined in section 34(3) of the Act are required to report any of the corruption offences such as theft, fraud, extortion, bribery involving an amount of R100,000 or more”. Instead of reporting “crimes” in his farm, Ramaphosa opted to use clandestine methods including kidnapping, assault, and bribery to retrieve this dollars.
This violation of PRECCA by Ramaphosa, which is “South Africa’s main anti-bribery and anti- corruption legislation, was also affirmed by the Section 89 Independent Panel on Phala Phala led by Retired Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo which found that Ramaphosa had a prima facie case to answer, yet law enforcement agencies chose to turn a blind eye on the crimes committed by their principal.
Despite clear prima facie evidence of violations spanning several criminal and legal domains such as— money laundering, racketeering, tax evasion, customs, currency, and exchange laws, kidnapping of vulnerable members of our society, including women and other grave offences.
The question begs the following, why would a sitting President have gone to such criminal lengths to retrieve dollars that he acquired legally?