President Zuma must explain why Phiyega's conflict of interest was not revealed
The revelation of a second major conflict of interest on the part of the new National Police Commissioner General Riah Phiyega raises serious questions as to how she could have been appointed (see report).
I will today write to President Zuma informing him of the conflict of interest and requesting an explanation of how her appointment was decided on. I will also be querying whether she has the relevant security clearance.
A report in The Star today has revealed that General Phiyega quit her post as a director of Lefatshe Technologies and, only a few days later, headed up a corruption probe into the same company without declaring her links to the company. This is a clear conflict of interest which once again was not revealed in the CV submitted to the Portfolio Committee on Police.
Despite President Zuma singing her praises when announcing her appointment, there have now been numerous questions raised around her employment history and previous business interests.
General Phiyega has not declared a conflict of interest on two occasions that we know of - XON and now Lefatshe. Her excuse in the XON case was that she was no longer in the position when it became a conflict of interest. This time, she's using the excuse that she was a ‘non-executive member' and never had any shareholding.