POLITICS

Shaun Abrahams 'gravely disappointed' by ConCourt ruling

Parliament has been given 18 months to amend the NPA Act

Shaun Abrahams 'gravely disappointed' by ConCourt ruling

13 August 2018

Shaun Abrahams has expressed disappointment following the Constitutional Court's confirmation on Monday that his appointment as National Prosecution Authority head was unconstitutional and invalid.

"He [Abrahams] was gravely disappointed, but he respects the decision of the apex court in the land," NPA national spokesperson Luvuyo Mfaku told News24. 

When delivering his ruling on Monday morning, Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga said former president Jacob Zuma's decision to terminate Abraham's predecessor Mxolisi Nxasana from the position as the National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) was an abuse of power and that the Abrahams was a beneficiary of that abuse.Thus, the appointment of Abrahams was unconstitutional as well.

The matter came to the Constitutional Court after the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria declared, in December 2017, that Zuma's conduct in the matter was unconstitutional.

Speaking on the side-lines following the much anticipated ruling, Nxasana said that he was glad that there had never been any allegation that he was not fit and proper to run the office of the NPA.

Nxasana said the last three years, following his axing, had been "very tough", adding that he had not been working since he was fired. 'It has been very tough' He said he had also given up his practice of 16 years when he went to the NPA. "For me, I have to go back to practise [law]. I can tell you it has been very tough. For the whole three years, my life has been hanging, because I didn't know what to do. I am a practitioner by profession, but I couldn't go back full time to [the] profession." The Constitutional Court also found that certain sections of the NPA Act were constitutionally invalid.

Parliament has been given 18 months to amend the NPA Act.

President Cyril Ramaphosa was also ordered to appoint a new NDPP within 90 days.It was revealed in June that Ramaphosa was waiting for the court's judgment on Abrahams before making a decision.

"We are not appointing [a new NDPP], that simply must go to the appointing authority which is the Presidency. The president is the appointing authority," Mfaku said on Monday. It was not immediately known who would be acting NDPP pending Ramaphosa's decision.

'Stability and certainty at NPA'

Parliament’s Portfolio Committee on Justice and Correctional Services chairperson, Mathole Motshekga, said the finding by Madlanga that Abrahams' appointment was unconstitutional and invalid, should bring closure to "a long-drawn-out chapter"."This has led to uncertainty at the National Prosecuting Authority. The focus should now revert back to stability and certainty at the NPA," Motshekga said. 

Motshekga said he would "do everything in his power" to ensure that the amendment to the NPA Act happened as speedily as possible. "We want to ensure a strong and constitutionally sound legislation."Meanwhile, DA MP Glynnis Breytenbach said Ramaphosa should stop "evading the inevitable" and should appoint a credible and independent NDPP who would restore the public faith in the integrity of the NPA.

Breytenbach said Parliament should play a central role in the appointment of the new NDPP to prevent political influence over the NPA.

News24