Solar is clean and instant – nuclear is costly and distant
24 March 2016
Mr Zuma wants to push ahead with the nuclear build. He is doing so in spite of the fact that nearly R10-billion was wasted by the government on the Pebble Bed reactor. Had that money gone into renewable energy, electricity would have been flowing into thousands of factories, mines and homes to stimulate our economy. The failure of the pebble bed reactor was quietly made to go away. Now, once again, the question of nuclear power stations is in the air. Will there be a different result this time around?
Électricité de France, EDF, has been building a nuclear plant at Flamanville in Normandy, France. The same company is finding difficulty to procure £18bn to construct a plant of similar design at Hinkley Point in the UK. That is owing to the French plant being years behind schedule and the estimated cost of €3.3bn will have shot up to €10.5bn. It is a risk South Africa cannot even contemplate.
Prolonged delays and cost overruns will most certainly also occur in South Africa as we have seen with Kusile and Medupi. The estimated cost and scheduled date of completion must therefore be multiplied by 3 or 4.
EDF is presently having difficulty with the steel for the reactor vessel. If EDF fails the steel test, it will add more years to the construction and push up the price even higher. The same problem is occurring in Finland.