“Yawn” was the comment posted by a reader of the Eye Witness News tweet, “#PharrellProtest BDS is campaigning against the retailer’s importing of Israeli products.” Aside from the incessant barrage of tweets and Facebook posts by BDS, that seems to be the general South African reaction.
People are gatvol with being intimidated and threatened for not obediently following BDS’ instructions on where to shop and what concerts they they are allowed to attend. While BDS’s right to protest and to not attend the Pharrell Williams Concert on Monday night should be respected, we likewise expect them to respect our constitutional right to hear the magic of Pharrell.
The City of Cape Town is now being subjected to the same threats that Jewish South Africans, and indeed all constitution-loving South African citizens, have experienced at BDS’ hands for some time now. Here are a few pointers that we would like to share with its leadership:
For a start, BDS are not concerned with Palestinian Solidarity. They are not interested in creating a Palestinian state alongside Israel - the ‘two state solution’ supported by our government, and the majority of South Africans, including SA Jewry. Their objective, rather, is Israel’s destruction, and this vitriolic hatred has recurrently been directed against Jewish fellow South Africans. The justification by their National Coordinator of BDS protesters chanting `Shoot the Jew’ is just one in a long string of vehemently antisemitic outcomes of BDS campaigns.
BDS’ righteous indignation’ against anyone standing in the way of their grandstanding is something we see time and time again. Their press conferences routinely denounce anyone who doesn’t support their ‘noble’ campaign, be it the City of Cape Town, the universities, the stores they are boycotting or, all too often, the Jewish community.
They assume that they have a right to conduct their campaign according to their handbook (BDS101) and if anyone has the gall to question that – raising such issues as public safety, city regulations or even the notion that South Africans are entitled to attend a concert of their choosing – they are labelled as anti-Palestinian and, in Williams’ case, threatened with “the largest protest any artist has faced in South Africa since the dawn of democracy".