SADTU in KZN raises critical questions on the state of education in the province
1 August 2017
On 28 until 30 July, 2017, SADTU KZN held a Political School for leaders of the Union. More than 700 leaders drawn from 80 branches and 7 regions in the province, attended. As part of the discussions, were the declining standards of living, the austerity measures which result in the growing unemployment and silent retrenchments.
SADTU remains shocked and worried by the growing tendency of the Department of trying everything possible to reduce the allocation of resources to schools. It is for the first time that there is such a huge outcry by members of School Governing Bodies and School Management Teams. The outcry is as a result of reduced norms and standards allocations which equals pick pocketing of schools. When such things happen, we doubt the commitment of the very same officials responsible for dispensing monies to schools whether they fully understand the mandate of the Department which is to ensure delivery of quality public education. There cannot be a situation where the Department tries all tricks to save and in the process compromise the very same mandate the Department has an obligation on. Some schools have received less than half of the expected allocation.
The funding of schools in our province is currently inadequate, irrational and unconnected to the dire needs and resourcing for schools. The department of education in KZN is currently unable to match the national norm for funding as determined by the National Department of Basic Education. The schools in Quintile 1 to 3 should be receive R1 242 for each learner but they are allocated R955. This on its own is a travesty of equalities fought for and 23 years into our democracy and paints a grim picture for the delivery of quality education in the province.
Under the leadership of MEC Mthandeni Dlungwana, the Department of Education has, for the first time robbed the poorest of the schools, large amounts of funds by making gross cuts of norms and standards for many schools particularly in rural areas. Some schools received mere R90 000 when they had expected R489 000 and the disparities differ proportionally from school to school. We find this incongruent with the stated objectives of the department to improve results across the spectrums of the schooling system. Schools are now expected to do more with less and there are no means to compensate for the lost income. Many of these school have higher concentration of learners from low income or no income families with parents either unemployed or being recipients of social grants. Transparency in allocation of funds is critical in ensuring that every child has access to quality education. The Department goes further to make deductions for domestic accounts mainly for electricity and water usage without engaging both the schools and the municipalities. It is our view that municipalities, seemingly baying for the resources of our institutions, have identified schools as easy targets to collect revenue. The Department of Education cannot readily and blindly deliver schools to cash trapped municipalities whose billing systems have caused financial havoc to many.