NUMSA has made submissions to SCOPA on the Road Accident Fund
12 September 2023
The National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (NUMSA) has made submissions to parliaments Standing Committee on Public Accounts (SCOPA) on the state of the Road Accident Fund. In our submission we highlighted critical issues which are preventing RAF from being a viable entity. RAF is grossly mismanaged and this continues to negatively affect the claimants. Included in the issues we raises are the following:
The termination of the panel of attorneys: The termination of the panel of the attorneys has created a major problem for the RAF, particularly in relation to appointing experts to conduct assessments on claims so they can know the seriousness of the injuries. Without the attorneys it means that they cannot counter what the plaintiff attorneys are demanding. They must pay what is demanded by the claimants because there are no reports and no attorneys to defend RAF and present to the court an alternative. This has led to an unbearable backlog left to be processed by the few Claims Handlers remaining at the RAF. Each Claims Handler has about 2000 claims on their profiles. They handle about 7 trials a day, which is virtually impossible to manage. The amount of default judgements issued against RAF has immensely increased the organization's expenditure on legal costs, resulting in wasteful expenditure. As a result of the removal of the panel of attorneys, the RAF is unable to meaningfully settle matters in court, and they are unable to pay Claimants on time. This results in a pile of unpaid court orders left unattended. Judge Legodi's judgement, which states that the CEO of RAF, Collins Letsoalo must personally pay for the legal costs in two RAF matters because the fund did not do its work, is supported by the union. It clearly illustrates the challenges brought about by the CEO's lack of foresight. Previously when summons were served the system automatically appointed a panel attorney to defend. However, after termination of panels, default judgements are a daily challenge and Attorneys are now demanding favourable settlements. This resulted in claims for, example, whiplashes, being settled for more than R 6 million when they could have been settled for far less had the matter been defended by a panel attorney.
The understaffed state attorneys do not want to run trials since they are overwhelmed by cases. They settle against assessments made by claim handlers, in favour of unreasonable offers by claimant's attorneys just to close cases. Directives that are contrary to the RAF Act are costly. This results in snowballing wrongly rejected claims which will result in an uncontrollable avalanche of claims in addition to the current backlog. The CEO simply holds the view that he will appeal all the judgements against him simply because he can, despite the low probability of winning.
Instead of correcting the problem, RAF management has chosen to blame hard working employees and suspended some of them for failing to load court orders. The RAF misrepresented facts to SCOPA and stated that there are 200 employees who have been suspended for fraud and corruption. He claims they collude with the attorneys. We have to state that not a single NUMSA member has been suspended or dismissed for fraud and corruption. There are 11 employees who were suspended on other charges and these relate to massive backlogs caused by the covid-19 hard lockdown, and this created massive backlogs. At the same time, during that period the RAF was hacked which resulted in information being lost and workers were unable to do their jobs properly and the CEO is blaming workers for this situation, even though they did not create the problem. These workers have been sitting at home on suspension with full pay, because the RAF is not ready to proceed with disciplinary hearings. In one case, the employee was successfully defended by NUMSA and exonerated, but the RAF is refusing to re-instate the worker.