Sakeliga requests suspension of race-requirements for tenders at Eskom pending outcome of court case
2 April 2019
Business organisation Sakeliga today announces legal action to challenge race-based pre-qualification for contractors at state-owned enterprises (SOEs). The organisation will also request Eskom, the Minister of Finance and the Minister of Public Enterprises to suspend race-based pre-qualification requirements at Eskom, pending the outcome of Sakeliga’s court case.
Sakeliga’s decision to pursue the court case, challenging the legality of SOEs’ pre-emptive disqualification of contractors based on race, comes especially in light of the electricity crisis in South Africa. Sakeliga calls on communities in general, but business communities in particular to sign Sakeliga’s memorandum at www.pickmypower.co.za.
Sakeliga CEO Piet le Roux says Eskom’s race-based disqualification of contractors is unreasonably limiting the pool from which it could draw expertise: “It has come to our attention that Eskom has increasingly been setting race-based pre-qualification criteria in its tender documents. Today, businesses who are not 51% black-owned are frequently pre-emptively disqualified from even being considered for award of a tender. By disqualifying contractors based on race, Eskom now precludes – at a critical time for the economy and society – electricity consumers in South Africa from the full range of cost-effective expertise available on the market. I shall therefore be writing to Phakamani Hadebe, CEO of Eskom, Tito Mboweni, Minister of Finance and Pravin Gordhan, Minister of Public Enterprises to request suspension of race-based pre-qualification requirements at Eskom pending the outcome of Sakeliga’s court case.”
Le Roux comments on Sakeliga’s legal action: “SOEs set these pre-qualification criteria for contractors under regulations in terms of the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (PPPFA, Act 5 of 2000). The regulations were promulgated in 2017 by then Minister of Finance Pravin Gordhan. We objected to these regulations at the time and subsequent to promulgation challenged it in court. While initial judgement in the case was unfavourable to Sakeliga, with the Gauteng High Court dismissing the application in November 2018, Sakeliga has decided to appeal the case on advice of several counsel, including two senior counsel.”