Tongaat Hulett judgment upholds the validity of statutory obligations to industry
5 December 2023
On Monday, 4 December 2023, Judge Vahed today delivered his judgment on the Tongaat Hulett application to suspend the miller’s payment obligations arising out of the Sugar Industry Agreement. The judgment vindicates the South African Sugar Association (SASA) position that the Sugar Industry Agreement creates statutory, not contractual, obligations which are not overridden by the business rescue process under the Companies Act.
The judgment further rejects the argument that payment obligations under the Sugar Industry Agreement can be separated from the rest of the Agreement as obligations falling with the scope section 136(2)(a) of the Companies Act. Rather, the judgment holds that the obligations under the Sugar Industry Agreement are ‘simply the cost of doing business’ and therefore not subject to the moratorium on the rights of claimants applicable to business rescue proceedings under the Companies Act.
Critically, the judgment takes into account the purpose of the Sugar Industry Agreement, that being to ensure that all parties – growers, millers and refiners – benefit from an equitable division of the proceeds of the local market and are insulated against the risk of the export market.
What this means practically, is that the Business Rescue Practitioners (BRP’s) at Tongaat Hulett and Gledhow cannot suspend the obligation to pay more than R1.5 million that was due to SASA at the end of March 2023, and which was not paid at the time due to the BRP’s contention that the business rescue process took precedence over industry arrangements.