South African Government's Response to Questions on the Eskom loan application to the World Bank
The World Bank Board will consider a $3.75 billion project loan to South Africa's power utility, Eskom on 8 April 2010 to finance its capital expenditure programme. The premise upon which the World Bank loan application for Eskom was made, was based on the fundamental belief that developing countries must be allowed to develop their energy security for their populations, in the most cost effective and sustainable manner.
South Africa is pursuing an energy strategy compatible with both our commitments in the Copenhagen Accord to reduce emissions by 34% below the "business as usual" level by 2020, and 42% by 2025. This strategy includes meeting urgent generation expansion while committing to an aggressive programme to enhance energy efficiency measures and introducing renewable energy as well as demand-side management.
The generation technologies that Eskom has chosen to use are fully embedded in and informed by the Long Term Mitigation Scenarios (LTMS) adopted by the Government in 2008. The intention is to ensure that carbon emissions peak during 2020-2025, reaching a plateau for a decade, and then begin declining thereafter. Therefore the issue of carbon mitigation from increased generation needs to be viewed in a broader context, as the mitigations derive from several sources and sectors, and also over an extended time frame. Since the LTMS and its outcomes, there has been sound assurance among various stakeholders, within government, civil society and the private sector, of implementation actions that are required to meet its objectives. The Medupi power plant for example, is the first in Africa to use the cleaner coal "supercritical" technology, the same technology used in developed countries for new coal power generation.
The Government of South Africa and Eskom have sought to consult and engage with stakeholders, domestically and internationally, on Eskom's loan application to the World Bank. In the interest of transparency and good governance, we have listed the following questions and concerns raised by stakeholders and our responses.
[CUT]