WHY LEADERSHIP MATTERS
When I was studying at Wits University in the late 1970s, lecturers would sneer at the "Great Man" view of history. They were mostly Marxists and talked about vast impersonal forces that determined events.
Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan and South Korea were the rising economic tigers in the 1970s, but my sociology lecturers saw hope in "Euro-Marxism".
They were not critical of Mao Zedong, who was actually a mass murderer who enormously hindered China's economic progress. And Lenin, also a mass murderer, was studied seriously as a model for revolutionary change.
Leftist revolutionaries were given a free pass, in contrast to the worst accusations thrown at Western "imperialist" powers. I suspect that leftist academics still cannot comprehend why Ronald Reagan and Maggie Thatcher are heroes in Eastern European countries that suffered under Soviet imperialism.
Many university dons are so far removed from ordinary people that their policy prescriptions are dangerous. American writer William Buckley once said that he would "rather entrust the government of the United States to the first 400 people listed in the Boston telephone directory than to the faculty of Harvard University."