Let`s stop the hogging of opposite lanes: The intersection of Public Office and Business (Lifestyle Audits Remain Relevant)
The recent call by COSATU supported by the Young Communist League, on the need to audit lifestyles of leaders, government officials and political office bearers in government at all levels has generated necessary debate. It is in the first instance, important to dispel the notion created in some quarters that this particular call is pregnant of a witch hunt and therefore, from this conceived unfounded basis, it must be defeated. A careful survey of those who are the leading voices in taking this posture are unwittingly laying bare their agenda which therefore, in return, degenerates their counter argument against the lifestyle audit . The only conclusion that one arrives at, is the fact that they are mobilizing against it because there are guilty of this practice.
The 12th congress of the SACP made an important pronouncement for the need to separate the intersection between business and the public office; this is to say those who are public representatives must not be allowed to be in business simultaneously. This dualism must not be seen as a mere democratic right. We totally agree with the Party but more qualification suffices in this regard.
It is a matter of historical fact that many of our comrades that we were in the same trenches with in defense of comrade Zuma since his dismissal in 2005; our solid support in his marathon legal defense and the mobilization towards Polokwane Conference, were far from what we wanted to achieve in the post Mbeki era in terms of social transformation. Essentially, for them, the struggle against Mbeki was personal than a principled one as it was with the left. The facade has been lifted. Alas, with a greater stampede, is a move to crowd out the cream on top of the cake!
We are calling for a policy that bans anyone and at whatever level of the state to be in business. Anyone making a conscious choice to accept a position in government must do so with these implications fully comprehended. Any interest in the private sector must mean an absence of choice in continuing with government as a salaried person. We refuse to be intimidated by shortage of skills in the public service and therefore a potential for more skills flight to the private sector.
There is nothing insurmountable and skills are a product of investment to their production they are not spontaneous. But again we know that the trend is to normally register companies through spouses and other next of kin`s. Again this policy must find a way of imposing certain limitations such as illegalizing spouses and other next of kin in getting contracts from government at all levels. In this context of banning leaders and employees of government we mean the following government and other statutory bodies: