As Zimbabwe approaches the polls, a simple reading of the evolving Zimbabwe situation may incline one to quickly conclude on a Hobbesian reality: a corrosive state of nature, a violent destiny, perdition, and wanton anguish. However, an evidence-based contrarian analysis of the Zimbabwean political economy brings into focus another perspective, and posits that material conditions in the domestic environment have the capacity to author a revival, a reflection of the venerable arguments of a classic business cycle.
Since time immemorial, economic cycles have been constant features of sovereign affairs. Current economic powerhouses have been basket cases of the past. The contemporary indefatigable parent of the EU, Germany, emerged from an economy paralyzed by the consequences of the wars, including hyperinflation, and the malaise of an insular political system.
The poster child of the developmental state, South Korea, was emaciated by the ravages of imperialism, and had to turn to a military dictator to eventually author a triumphal recovery story. As the cases of Ghana, Mozambique, Malaysia and Indonesia attest, the list is indeed endless, but this reflects the fact that most countries have the capacity to emerge from the backwaters of underdevelopment and steadily claw back to record heightened output.
Notably, there are certain inescapable common features of sovereigns that successfully negotiated the growth path, namely expertise-laden exploitation of the domestic environment and engagement with the external world.
Zimbabwe has the potential to recover and write another African legend. The structure of the Zimbabwean economy reflects a well-balanced economy, with the major sectoral contributors to the gross domestic product being mining, agriculture, manufacturing and services. In fact, analysis of the structural processes in the domestic front show an economy already sprouting green shoots.
The agriculture sector is on an irrefutable recovery mode, spurred by increase in sugar, cotton and tobacco production. In 2012 the agriculture sector grew by 4.6%, and contributed 5.6% to growth domestic product. The tobacco sector earnings deserve granular exposition. The 2010 auction records show that the tobacco sector produced 123m kg of the green leaf, and that output generated US$355m in revenues. The 2012 auction records showed an improvement; a production of 144m kg, and sales of US$525m. Despite recurrent ravages of drought and other disturbances, increase in output reflects tenacity, buoyancy; a welcome development as agriculture is a major foreign currency earner.