Cipro doubles budget for 2010/11, but fail to pitch at parliament
It is highly problematic that the Companies and Intellectual Property Registration Office (Cipro) did not appear before Parliament this week, as scheduled, given that this office has been involved in serious allegations of corruption at the highest levels. Worse still, the expenditure budget of Cipro has now suddenly doubled - from R 243 million in 2009/10 to R 561 million in the 2010/11 financial year - and Parliament needs an explanation for this.
We need to establish the reasons for the doubling of the budget, to determine whether there are legitimate new items of expenditure, or whether there are further budgetary shenanigans going on, similar to what we saw from Labour Director General Jimmy Manyi earlier this week.
Cipro's failure to pitch to this meeting raises a red flag. This is the second postponement in two months. Cipro was previously scheduled to appear before the portfolio committee on 9 February 2010. The programme was then also changed at the last moment. Additionally, the portfolio committee on trade and industry submitted written questions to Cipro that were to be responded to before that meeting. Members of the portfolio committee were this week still looking for the answers to these questions.