Negotiating the Multiple Demands of Transformation
A friend of mine, whom I shall refer to under the pseudonym of Dr. Kildare (from the American TV series), is about to be forced into retirement by the Western Cape provincial government. Dr. Kildare is a physician who runs a clinic for uninsured people, or people seeking care through the public sector at the university’s hospital, and who is much in demand for his clinical and research work across the African continent and also in Europe and America. The provincial government mandates retirement at age sixty-five.
Mandatory retirement has always been in place in the province, although it has acquired new meaning under the current constitution. In the past it was about transitioning the aging into the easy comfort of retirement as their minds and bodies supposedly declined. Now it is also about the dictates of transformation. My friend is well aware that his forced retirement is meant ideally to shift leadership to younger people who would have been formerly excluded by the old regime on account of race. Dr. Kildare knows this is a central demand of his democratizing society.
Life expectancies have dramatically improved over the past thirty years and thanks to the very modern medicine Dr. Kildare practices, physicians like him routinely hit their stride in their sixties, thanks to decades of clinical experience and long engagement with the complexities of research. Since it is an equally deep imperative of transformation that the resources of South Africa be opened to all, including and especially its medical care, Dr. Kildare’s forced retirement at the height of his powers is a tiny but decisive crippling of the public good.
And so there is a conflict between two equally central goals of transformation: First the demand that Dr. Kildare be retired so his job can be opened to a younger person, ideally of colour. Second the demand that he not retire so that his long and vital experience is not lost to the public good. And it seems that neither the university nor the government are able to adequately grapple with this conflict of interests. Mandatory retirement is subjecting universities to a continual shedding of the very publically minded talent that a knowledge-driven but also socially conscious university is meant to prize and cultivate.
Ironically forced retirement for physicians tends to drive them into private medicine where they can earn many times the salary they currently get by restricting their services to the one percent (fifteen percent actually but who’s counting). Their services switch from the public to the private good.