JAUNDICED EYE
United States President Donald Trump wants to end foreign aid to countries that consistently vote against it at the United Nations. Despite cries of “extortion” and “bribery” from outraged aid recipients, this is a damn fine idea of Trump’s.
Internationally, it’s a wake-up call to a host of nations that think of Uncle Sam as their all-year-round Father Christmas who doesn’t even demand that they be good boys and girls. And, similarly, to the many Americans, not only in the Trump administration, who see global politics in simplistic transactional terms – we pay, you dance – it’s going to prove to be an unexpected bucket of cold water to the face.
Whatever the altruism that it is packaged in, aid is not only a humanitarian project by nations. There are reciprocal economic benefits and there is, of course, the influence that money buys.
On the expenditure side of that equation, the US is not as unassailable as Trump thinks. The US, depending on how you slice-and-dice definitions of aid, doled out $31bn-$43bn in 2015. China’s murky aid budget was at least $38bn, while that of the European Union was $92bn. Britain, with a much smaller population than the US, has a $19bn aid budget.