Labour brokers: DWEA Minister bowing to union pressure?
In reply to a Democratic Alliance (DA) parliamentary question, the Department of Water and Environmental Affairs (DWEA) has become the latest national department to admit to making use of labour brokers. It joins the departments of Justice, Agriculture, Public Service and Administration, Social Development, Health, Transport, Communication and the Treasury in this regard. The DWEA used 211 people placed by labour brokers last year, at a cost of R18.7 million. The total amount spent by all departments on labour broking in 2008/09 to date is R142.5 million and a total of 721 people have been placed. A full breakdown follows in the table below this statement.
Significantly, the Minister [Ms Buyelwa Patience Sonjica] also stated that the department "views the current discussions around the use of labour brokers very seriously and has phased out this practice".
This statement is problematic for three reasons:
- First, it suggests that the Minister is ignorant of the growing demand for labour brokering in his own department. The number of individuals placed by labour brokers in the DWEA increased by 131%, to 211 positions, in 2008/09. It has increased every year for the last three years, from 83 to 91 to 211.
- Second, the view expressed suggests that the Minister has conflated his personal political opinions with the objective public interest that is supposed to define his public office. Put another way, there is a debate on labour brokering at the moment, no decision to ban them has been taken, for the Minister to state as much suggests he has preempted the outcome of that debate, and is acting to appease political opposition to labour brokering from Cosatu and the ANC.
- Third, in much the same fashion as the entire debate on labour brokering has been defined, the Minister offers no considered explanation for this position. Why does he want to ban it? For example, various government departments have admitted that "Temporary Employment Services are used for short term project related work or replacing employees absent for extended periods such as maternity leave and sick leave." That is perfectly reasonable and understandable. If the DWEA is no longer using labour brokers, then what is the policy in this regard?
A myriad of carefully considered and well founded arguments have already been made as to why labour brokers are required - the fact that maternity leave creates the need for short term employees is just another one. The ANC and Cosatu needs to think twice on their calls to ban labour brokers - doing so would create a huge disincentive to employ women, since an employer would not be able to fill that position during the time at which she is by law entitled to maternity leave.
More broadly it would have a profoundly negative effect on our economy.