RESPONSE TO SACTWU'S AWARDING OF ‘WORST EMPLOYER AWARD' TO NEWCASTLE CHINESE EMPLOYERS
We acknowledge the "award" that the Southern African Clothing and Textiles Workers' Union bestowed upon the Newcastle Chinese Chamber of Commerce at their 11th National Congress, which was recently held in Cape Town. However, we are disappointed at the way the press statement released by Sactwu on 26 September 2010 has branded Chinese-South African's in a negative way that further polarizes South Africa's diverse ethnic population.
We feel that it is imperative to respond to some of the accusations made in Sactwu's press statement of 26 September 2010. To brand the Newcastle Chinese Chamber of Commerce as "employers who break down, not build decent work in the clothing industry" is inaccurate. Throughout the entire process of talking to and negotiating with the Bargaining Council and Sactwu, which only began in late August of 2010 we have been transparent, honest and have continually stated that we wish to find an equable solution for employers, employees and for the South African clothing industry.
Our involvement in the clothing industry has created much needed employment in Newcastle. The Chinese Chamber of Commerce has 115 members with only 45 members being involved in the clothing sector representing approximately 2500 workers not the "4000" stated by the union. We believe the union has got its facts confused as they had initially engaged with the Newcastle Chinese Clothing & Textile Association in September 2009 and not with our chamber. It must also be stated that there are currently 358 clothing companies in the whole of South Africa that are targeted by the Bargaining Council for not paying minimum wages. According to the Bargaining Council, the worst paying employer in South Africa is not a Chinese company.
At our initial meeting with the union, we placed on record our willingness and intention of creating a ‘disciplinary committee' that would have external moderators and evaluators to ensure that our members comply with the outcome of the current negotiations. When we discovered that members of the Newcastle Chinese Clothing & Textile Association were paying unacceptable wages, we immediately distanced ourselves from them. Subsequently, all negotiations with the Bargaining Council and the union by the Chinese Chamber of Commerce have been only for its members and no other party. We have however joined other employer associations in South Africa to submit a new wage proposal to the Bargaining Council as was requested by the Department of Labor.
We are perturbed when the union states in its press release, "employment creation in the clothing industry cannot be based on slave wages." First, there needs to be a clear definition by the union to the meaning of "slave wages," and secondly we have never had any intention to exploit Newcastle's community. We have stated the various reasons why we cannot afford the current legislated wages and these reasons have been widely published in the media. In this regard it must once again be mentioned that more than half of all the companies registered with the Bargaining Council do not pay the minimum wages. This is a sure indication that the whole wage structure of the clothing industry in South Africa is wrong.